Top

Material examined
Taxonomy
Common Name
Distribution
Taxonomy Changes
Diagnosis
Hosts
Similar Taxa
Biology
References
Notes
Print Fact Sheet
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ

Click on images to enlarge

Fig. 1. Panonychus ulmi adult female (non-type; Hungary) - detail of claws II, III, IV.

Fig. 2. Panonychus ulmi adult female (non-type; Hungary) - detail of empodium, indicating the long tenent hairs on the lateral true claws.

Fig. 3.  Panonychus ulmi adult female (non-type) - detail of empodium (redrawn from Geijskes (1939)).

Fig. 4.  Panonychus ulmi adult female (non-type; Hungary) - dorsal habitus.

Fig. 5.  Panonychus ulmi adult female (non-type) - dorsal habitus (redrawn from Geijskes (1939)).

Fig. 6.  Panonychus ulmi adult female (non-type) - lateral habitus, with detail of setae f1, f2, h1.

Fig. 7.  Panonychus ulmi adult female and male (non-type) - lateral habitus (redrawn from Geijskes (1939)).

Fig. 8.  Panonychus ulmi adult female (non-type) - posterior dorsum with detail of setae f1, f2, h1.

Fig. 9.  Panonychus ulmi adult female (non-type; Hungary) - detail of posterior dorsal setae.

Fig. 10.  Panonychus ulmi adult female (non-type; Hungary) - detail of peritreme (arrows indicate tips).

Fig. 11.  Panonychus ulmi adult female (non-type; Hungary) - detail of peritremes (arrows indicate tips).

Fig. 12.  Panonychus ulmi adult female (non-type; Hungary) - detail of cuticle on prodorsum, focussed on lobes.

Fig. 13.  Panonychus ulmi adult female (non-type; Hungary) - detail of cuticle on prodorsum, focussed on striae.

Fig. 14.  Panonychus ulmi adult female (non-type; Hungary) - dorsal cuticle between c1 and d1, indicating minute lobes (left) and underlying fine striae (right).

Fig. 15.  Panonychus ulmi adult female (non-type; Hungary) - detail of tarsus I, arrows indicating solenida, ft″ much longer than ft′.

Fig. 16.  Panonychus ulmi adult male (non-type) - dorsal habitus (redrawn from Geijskes (1939)).

Fig. 17.  Panonychus ulmi adult male (non-type) - detail of aedeagus (redrawn from Geijskes (1939)).

Panonychus ulmi (Koch, 1836)

Material examined

non-types (from Hungary)

Taxonomy

Subfamily Tetranychinae

Tribe Tetranychini

Common Name

European red mite

Distribution

+Australia, Afghanistan, Algeria, Argentina, Austria, Belgium, Bermuda, Brazil, Bulgaria, CIS, Canada, Chile, China, Costa Rica, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Egypt, Finland, France, *Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Iran, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Lebanon, Libya, Lithuania, Madeira Island, Morocco, New Zealand, Morocco, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Rumania, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Syria, Taiwan, The Netherlands, Tunisia, Turkey, UK, USA, Uruguay, Venezuela, Vietnam, Yugoslavia

Taxonomy Changes

Tetranychus ulmi Koch 1836

Oligonychus ulmi (Koch) Hirst 1920

Metatetranychus ulmi (Koch) Oudemans 1931

Paratetranychus ulmi (Koch) Andre 1937

Panonychus ulmi (Koch) Ehara 1956

Tetranychus pilosus Canestrini & Fanzago 1876

Paratetranychus pilosus (Canestrini & Fanzago) Zacher 1913

Metatetranychus pilosus (Canestrini & Fanzago) Oudemans 1931, synonymy Pritchard & Baker 1955

Paratetranychus pilosus alboguttatus Zacher 1913, synonymy Pritchard & Baker 1955

Tetranychus alboguttatus Zacher 1913

Metatetranychus alboguttatus (Zacher) Oudemans 1931, synonymy Pritchard & Baker 1955 

Paratetranychus pilosus occidentalis McGregor & Newcomer 1928, synonymy Pritchard & Baker 1955 

Oligonychus alni Oudemans 1929

Metatetranychus alni (Oudemans) Oudemans 1931, synonymy Pritchard & Baker 1955 

Oligonychus muscorum Oudemans 1929

Metatetranychus muscorum (Oudemans) Oudemans 1931, synonymy Pritchard & Baker 1955 

Oligonychus potentillae Oudemans 1929

Metatetranychus potentillae (Oudemans) Oudemans 1931, synonymy Pritchard & Baker 1955 

Metatetranychus mali Oudemans 1931, synonymy Pritchard & Baker 1955

Metatetranychus canestrinii Oudemans 1939, synonymy Pritchard & Baker 1955

Diagnosis

Female

Male as per female plus (Fig. 16):

Hosts

> 70 recorded species of host plant, including: Acacia longifolia (Mimosaceae), Alnus glutinosa, A. incana (Betulaceae), Artocarpus heterophyllus (Moraceae), Avena sativa (Poaceae), Betula pubescens, B. verrucosa (Betulaceae), Citrus aurantiifolia, C. aurantium, C. grandis (Rutaceae), Cotoneaster tomentosus, Crataegus monogyna, Cr. succulenta (Rosaceae), Cucurbita maxima, C. pepo (Cucurbitaceae), Cydonia oblonga (Rosaceae), Desmodium canescens (Fabaceae), Ficus carica (Moraceae), Fragaria vesca, Malus domesticusPrunus spp., Pyrus spp., Rosa spp., Rubus sp., Sorbus spp. (Rosaceae), Sorghum halepense, Triticum aestivum (Poaceae), *Ulmus spp. (Ulmaceae), Vicia sativa (Fabaceae), Vitis labrusca, V. vinifera (Vitaceae), Zea mays (Poaceae)

Similar Taxa

Panonychus citri (McGregor, 1916)

Biology

This species is a well-known pest of deciduous fruit trees in most parts of the world, and is common in Europe on apple, pear and plum (Geijskes 1939).  Individuals are found on both surfaces of the leaves.  It is a serious pest of apples in the cooler parts of Australia.

Overwintering eggs are deposited on rough bark at the bases of buds and spurs, on small branches and twigs and in crevices.  Eggs deposited in summer are found along the leaf veins on the underside of leaves.

References

Andre, M. (1937) Utilite et appplications de etudes acarologiques.  Paris: 380pp. 

+Bengston, M. (1960) How to control major pests of apples and pears in the Granite Belt.  Queensland Agricultural Journal 85: 102-107 

+Bengston, M. (1965)  European red mite (Panonychus ulmi (Koch)) and its adaptation to the Stanthorpe district, Queensland.  Queensland Journal of Agricultural and Animal Sciences 22: 177-185

Canestrini, G. and Fanzago, F. (1876) Nuovi Acari Italiana (sec. ser.)  Atti Acad. Sci. Ven. Tent. Istr. 5: 130-142 

Ehara, S. (1956) Notes on some tetraychid mites of Japan.  Jpn J. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 21: 139-147

Geijskes, D.C. (1939) Beiträge zur kenntnis der Europäischen spinnmilben (Acari, Tetranychidae), mit besonderer berücksichtigung der Niederländischen arten.  Mededeelingen van de Landbouwhoogeschool te Wageningen (Nederland) 42(4): 1-68

Hirst, S. (1920)  Revision of the English species of red spider (Genera, Tetranychus and Oligonychus).  Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 4: 49-60 

*Koch, C.L. (1836)  Deutsche Crustacea, Myriapoda, Arachnida, Fasc. I.

Migeon, A. and Dorkeld, F. (2006-2017) Spider Mites Web: a comprehensive database for the Tetranychidae. http://www.montpellier.inra.fr/CBGP/spmwebOudemans, A.C. (1929)  Acarologische Aanteekeningen XCIX.  Entomol. Ber., Amst. 8: 11-20 

Oudemans, A.C. (1931)  Acarologische Aanteekeningen CVI.  Entomol Ber., Amst. 8: 157-172 

Oudemans, A.C. (1939)  Neue Funde auf dem Bebiete der Systematik under der Nomenklatur der Acari. VI.  Zool Anz. 127: 75-80 

Pritchard, A.E. and Baker, E.W. (1955)  A revision of the spider mite family Tetranychidae.  Pacific Coast Entomology Society Memoirs 2: 1-472

+Womersley, H. (1940)  Studies in Australian Acarina, Tetranychidae and Trichadenidae.  Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia 64: 233-265

Zacher, F. (1913)  Untersuchungen uber Spinnmilbern.  Mitt. Kais. Biol. Anst. Land-Forst. 14: 37-41

Notes

Separated from P. citri by having dorsal setae h1 one third the length of f1 and f2 is two thirds the length of f1 (Meyer 1974), and eggs of P. ulmi lack the support silk strands running from the dorsal stipe to the leaf surface.