Skip to content

Oxythrips divisus

Recognition data

Distinguishing features

Both sexes fully winged. Body color yellow, antennal segments III � IX brown, forewings shaded. Antennae with segment VI partially divided, thus apparently 9-segmented; sensoria on III � IV forked. Head with three pairs of ocellar setae, pair III on anterior margins of ocellar triangle and slightly longer than distance between posterior ocelli. Pronotum with one pair of long posteroangular setae. Metanotum reticulate, median setae just behind anterior margin; campaniform sensilla present. Forewing first vein with three setae on distal half, second vein with about 11 setae. Abdominal tergites with median pair of setae not close together; tergite VIII without a marginal comb; sternites without discal setae. Male with small circular glandular area on sternites III � VII; tergite IX with two pairs of short stout setae medially.

Related and similar species

Bailey (1957: 189) recorded the European species Oxythrips quercicola Bagnall from Pinus and Quercus in California, but subsequent examination of Bailey's specimens indicates that this was a misidentification. The genus is thus known to occur in California, but the identity of the species involved remains unknown. In order to ensure that the genus can be recognized within the Californian fauna, the eastern USA species, O. divisus, is included here. The members of Oxythrips are very similar in structure to the species of Anaphothrips but have a pair of elongate pronotal posteroangular setae. Chilothrips species are also similar, but have the mouth cone unusually elongate.

Taxonomic data

Current valid name

Oxythrips divisus Hood

Original name and synonyms

Oxythrips divisus Hood, 1916: 39

Family placement

Thripidae, Thripinae

Biological data

Life history

Probably breeding in male cones

Host plants

Apparently Pinus spp.

Tospoviruses vectored

None

Crop damage

None

Distribution data

Area of origin

Eastern USA

Distribution

Maryland, Illinois [not known from California, see comment on related species]